An International Organisation for a Participatory Society?

The following has been posted in the online edition of The Occupied Times of London. It was written collectively by myself and some other members of the Greater London Chapter of the interim International Organisation for a Participatory Society. 

 How does one approach the creation of a new world in the face of such confusion, cynicism, ignorance and alienation? The left has failed at offering an effective, unified resistance to rampant neo-liberal capitalism. Weak from the many assaults from the establishment and the constant propaganda of the corporate media, the progressive/radical movements and organisations plod along fatigued from incessant external and internal conflict. The divided strands of radical individuals and groups don’t stand a chance against the clinical structure of the elite with all the apparatus of the state at their disposal. The Occupy movement has gone some way to refresh the left and offer new hope…the Thatcherite mantra There is No Alternative has never sounded so hollow in the face of people coming together with a common purpose to show how a different, more sane way of living can emerge from the most difficult of circumstances. In this respect, the Occupy movement has much in common with (and yet can learn a lot from) much of the destitute of the world who struggle as whole communities as a means of survival. In our materialistic Western society, we often forget or underestimate the value of mutual aid, respect and spiritual health. Our egos are trained to take over our minds and put the selfish, superficial needs of the individual above all else. Even those of us who keep our egos in check and battle the predatory values of capitalism, be it the conscientious political activist, caring social worker or the wise old neighbour next door, fall victim to self-indulgence occasionally.

 How then do we overcome our own conditioning and move from an oppositional force on the margins of public discourse to a wider movement with majority support and participation? At the beginning of 2012, leading activists from all over the world (including Noam Chomsky, John Pilger, David Graeber and others) came together to attempt to answer this question and formed the interim committee of the International Organisation for a Participatory Society (IOPS). The core values of this new, ambitious organisation were agreed to be: Self-Management, Equity/Justice, Solidarity, Diversity, Ecological Stewardship and Internationalism. These values would determine the vision of the organisation which would treat the Political, Economical, Kinship and Community/Culture spheres as being of equal importance to one another as part of a philosophy of complementary holism. In other words, all aspects of life should be considered in offering a vision for participatory societies, forming a network spanning the local, national and international. Self-determination for all peoples, whether in Shrewsbury or Shanghai, Lagos or Los Angeles wouldn’t contradict cooperation between the local and global. A bottom-up structure would facilitate this network of individuals and communities, groups and projects, to form a truly participatory world where every person could reach their full potential.

 Needless to say, such an idea seems utopian to many but this is what means to think of a better world. We set the parameters; we decide our future, unhindered by what is promoted as realistic or acceptable by elites and their cronies. In April, the interim website of IOPS was launched to help fulfill this vision. Partially inspired by Occupy and the decision-making processes of its assemblies, IOPS aims to encourage people to deliberate online and face-to-face. Local, Regional and National Chapters in a framework of nested councils would link whole countries and continents showing how they can function horizontally, where real power is held by the people in a truly democratic way. We hope that in this initial stage, IOPS can help provide a platform for the Occupy movement, improving organisation and advocating the worldwide expansion of the activities and core values at its heart.

Obviously there are many challenges to such a radical, international organisation. It is our hope that existingcampaigns on many fronts can use IOPS to broaden and sustain their activism beyond local/one-off/single-issue campaigns. Being at the interim stage of the organisation and having most of the members on the interim committee from either the United States or Europe, it has a long way to go to be truly international in the sense of having the participation of members in Asia, Africa and Latin America. The website has been translated into 9 other languages so far and is continuing to look for volunteers to translate yet more. The name and logo or the site is also interim….this is all open for democratic discussion and will be open to a popular vote once there is sufficient participation internationally. There is also the issue of excluding the illiterate and those without regular access to the internet but this problem can be overcome at a later time if the organisation grows in such numbers internationally that it reaches critical mass and ensures its core values are effectively promoted to all. Once we effectively organise, the main obstacles are the governments, corporations and financial institutions. Their power is illegitimate – more and more people are become conscious of this and crying out for something that realises all their hopes. Once this becomes global, the old order would crumble under the weight of popular resistance and solidarity. Our main challenge is convincing ourselves that we are capable of winning a better world. If we do that and organise relentlessly to achieve our goals, all this may eventually become more than an impossible dream.

Wallowing in our own misery

Last night the Republic of Ireland soccer team scraped a win against a poor Georgia side. I’ve seen some bad games of football in my life but by Jaysis, it was painful to watch. Georgia scored after 46 seconds and then were content to sit back for the rest of the game, which seemed a good tactic considering the impotence of the Irish attack. I reckon all would have went well for the Georgians if the referee hadn’t decided to gift Ireland a penalty for no reason in the second half. After that, it came as no surprise that Ireland scored again. The goal celebration of Robbie Keane was euphoric enough to make anyone believe that going 2-1 up against Georgia at home in the 80th minute is something worth getting euphoric about. Maybe I’m a killjoy but I think that was shameful. In such a shite World Cup qualifier, a bit of humility wouldn’t have gone amiss, especially considering the fans paid around €50 for the privilege (I watched it on the telly thank God). I cringe at the thought of them playing a decent team. I was looking forward to all this being pondered by the panel after the game - I expected Eamonn Dunphy to rip into the team, the manager and the FAI but to my disappointment he was very subdued in his criticism. Fleeting references to two of Ireland’s best players not even being picked for the squad were made but any anger he felt over that didn’t show. He must have used up all his anger on Saturday night during the Late Late show when he was talking about the recession. That was vintage Dunphy. He was passionate and emotional because he was discussing a serious issue, but even then he didn’t go half far enough in expressing what’s actually happening.

For anyone who missed the end of the Late Late Show on Saturday night, it was fascinating stuff. As unlikely as that sounds (I happened to come across it by accident while flicking through the channels) and as much as I dislike Pat Kenny as the next person, it was a great insight into the way the country seems to be ‘dealing’ with the ‘economic crisis’. Not that Pat Kenny was anything to do with how insightful it was. His bland and often irrelevant questions often led to bland and irrelevant answers from the two other middle aged men with Dunphy. The senator defended Biffo and the other scoundrel from the moneyed class slobbered on about how “we shouldn’t get caught up in obsessing about taking our anger out on bankers”. Rightly Dunphy got wound up by all the nonsense coming from the other two and said that the people that caused the crisis should be brought to justice. He went on to say that as much as he respected Biffo for “giving his life to public service” he was wrong not to attempt to hold such people to account. Tears weld up in his eyes when he reminisced about when his own father lost his job all those years ago and how he knows how difficult it is for working families being threatened with losing their homes. All this got a good response from the studio audience who clapped at his more honest analysis of the situation. People have had enough of official apologists and their servile explanations of the crisis - most people recognise bullshit for what it is. Despite this, there is a lot of confusion about what should be done. Taking to the streets is very much on the agenda but unless people are demanding real change- i.e. revolutionary change, then they are going to be screwed over even more than they have been. I understand Dunphy’s difficulty in expressing a more truthful/radical analysis of the situation considering his prominence on mainstream TV and radio, but it really needs to be said. Biffo deserves zero respect – he is part of a political class that looks out for itself and not the people – that is the case for any politician from a mainstream political party. The whole system is rotten to the core. If Dunphy took the same honest approach to this as he does with Chrisiano Ronaldo, he’d be calling us all “petulant brats”. People whinge about the government and yet, with infantile expectations, they expect the same crowd of gangsters to get us out of the mess. It’s time we collectively grew up, grab the social/economic bull by the horns and stop wallowing in our own misery.